Decisions and determinations
Showing 1-4 of 4 decisions.
By letter dated April 16, 2002, the parties were advised that the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) would now consider Mr. Suthons' application. As you are aware, in its Decision No.646-AT-A-2001 dated December 12, 2001, the Agency concluded that obesity, per se, is not a disability for the...
LET-AT-A-375-2002 | Letter Decision | 2002-12-31
Transport Canada requesting interpretation of provisions of the Air Transport Agreement between the Government of Canada and the Government of United States of America
Reference is made to your letter of May 9, 2002, requesting the Canadian Transportation Agency's (Agency) interpretation of provisions of the Air Transport Agreement between the Government of Canada and the Government of United States of America dated February 24, 1995 (the 1995 Agreement) related...
LET-A-354-2002 | Letter Decision | 2002-12-04
On May 14, 2001, Miriam Gallacher on behalf of Laura Patton filed, pursuant to subsection 172(1) of the Canada Transportation Act, S.C., 1996, c. 10, an application with the Canadian Transportation Agency (the Agency) regarding Royal Aviation Inc. (Royal). Subsequently, Royal was purchased by the...
LET-AT-A-23-2002 | Letter Decision | 2002-01-25
Application by the Council for Canadians with Disabilities for intervener status in the application by Linda McKay-Panos
In its letter dated December 20, 2001, the Council for Canadians with Disabilities (CCD) sought intervener status in the above-noted application. In its Decision No. LET-AT-A-495-2001 dated December 27, 2001, the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) acknowledged receipt of CCD's application and...
LET-AT-A-21-2002 | Letter Decision | 2002-01-23